vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Trip.com Group Ltd (TCOM) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Trip.com Group Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($304.6M vs $210.5M, roughly 1.4× T1 Energy Inc.). Trip.com Group Ltd runs the higher net margin — 27.8% vs -62.0%, a 89.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Trip.com Group Limited is a multinational travel agency headquartered in Shanghai, China. It is the largest online travel service provider in the world.
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
TCOM vs TE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $304.6M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $84.6M | $-130.6M |
| Gross Margin | 78.8% | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | -45.0% |
| Net Margin | 27.8% | -62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -375.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.12 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $304.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $210.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $53.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $242.7M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 23 | $214.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $84.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-28.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | $12.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 78.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 82.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 26.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -30.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 5.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 23 | $0.02 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.8B | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.2B | $547.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.8B | $96.9M |
| Total Assets | $36.9B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | 5.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.4B | $219.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $249.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | $7.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $547.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $591.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $603.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $602.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $7.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $23.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $96.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $183.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $201.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $538.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1B | $561.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $582.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $16.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $36.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.2B | $644.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $670.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $30.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.44× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $63.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $55.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-44.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-74.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-34.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-35.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-37.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -138.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 54.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TCOM
| Others | $273.0M | 90% |
| Other | $31.6M | 10% |
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |
