vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of T1 Energy Inc. (TE) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.4M vs $210.5M, roughly 1.7× T1 Energy Inc.). INTERFACE INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -62.0%, a 69.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. T1 Energy Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($55.0M vs $28.6M).
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
TE vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $210.5M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $-130.6M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | 10.0% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | -45.0% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | -62.0% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -375.2% | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.87 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.5M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $132.8M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.5M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $346.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $0 | $289.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-130.6M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-31.9M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.2M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.5M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-27.0M | $22.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-28.5M | $14.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.7% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -45.0% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.0% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -62.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.87 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.21 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.11 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.19 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.20 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.1M | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $547.3M | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $96.9M | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 5.65× | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.1M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.9M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $181.9M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $219.6M | $94.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $249.9M | $89.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $547.3M | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $591.2M | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $603.2M | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $602.3M | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.9M | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.9M | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $201.9M | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $538.7M | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $561.6M | $451.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $582.3M | $428.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $615.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $670.3M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.65× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.21× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.03× | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.9M | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $55.0M | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.1% | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.2% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-42.3M | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.9M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.4M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-44.8M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.4M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-28.0M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-16.2M | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.0M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.6M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-74.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.0M | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.6M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-37.7M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -138.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
