vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of T1 Energy Inc. (TE) and Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

T1 Energy Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($210.5M vs $183.8M, roughly 1.1× Wheels Up Experience Inc.). Wheels Up Experience Inc. runs the higher net margin — -15.7% vs -62.0%, a 46.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. T1 Energy Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($55.0M vs $-58.3M).

Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.

Wheels Up is a provider of "on demand" private aviation in the United States and one of the largest private aviation companies in the world. It was founded in 2013 by Kenny Dichter, using a membership/on-demand business model. Wheels Up members can book private aircraft from the company fleet and third-party operators using a mobile application.

TE vs UP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TE
TE
1.1× larger
TE
$210.5M
$183.8M
UP
Higher net margin
UP
UP
46.3% more per $
UP
-15.7%
-62.0%
TE
More free cash flow
TE
TE
$113.2M more FCF
TE
$55.0M
$-58.3M
UP

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
TE
TE
UP
UP
Revenue
$210.5M
$183.8M
Net Profit
$-130.6M
$-28.9M
Gross Margin
10.0%
14.3%
Operating Margin
-45.0%
-0.9%
Net Margin
-62.0%
-15.7%
Revenue YoY
-10.2%
Net Profit YoY
-375.2%
67.0%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.87
$-0.04

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
TE
TE
UP
UP
Q4 25
$183.8M
Q3 25
$210.5M
$185.5M
Q2 25
$132.8M
$189.6M
Q1 25
$53.5M
$177.5M
Q4 24
$204.8M
Q3 24
$0
$193.9M
Q2 24
$0
$196.3M
Q1 24
$0
$197.1M
Net Profit
TE
TE
UP
UP
Q4 25
$-28.9M
Q3 25
$-130.6M
$-83.7M
Q2 25
$-31.9M
$-82.3M
Q1 25
$-16.2M
$-99.3M
Q4 24
$-87.5M
Q3 24
$-27.5M
$-57.7M
Q2 24
$-27.0M
$-97.0M
Q1 24
$-28.5M
$-97.4M
Gross Margin
TE
TE
UP
UP
Q4 25
14.3%
Q3 25
10.0%
6.8%
Q2 25
24.7%
8.3%
Q1 25
33.3%
10.8%
Q4 24
13.9%
Q3 24
13.9%
Q2 24
2.3%
Q1 24
-0.6%
Operating Margin
TE
TE
UP
UP
Q4 25
-0.9%
Q3 25
-45.0%
-33.1%
Q2 25
-22.0%
-31.4%
Q1 25
-44.2%
-45.5%
Q4 24
-26.0%
Q3 24
-21.6%
Q2 24
-40.3%
Q1 24
-42.9%
Net Margin
TE
TE
UP
UP
Q4 25
-15.7%
Q3 25
-62.0%
-45.1%
Q2 25
-24.0%
-43.4%
Q1 25
-30.4%
-55.9%
Q4 24
-42.7%
Q3 24
-29.8%
Q2 24
-49.4%
Q1 24
-49.4%
EPS (diluted)
TE
TE
UP
UP
Q4 25
$-0.04
Q3 25
$-0.87
$-0.12
Q2 25
$-0.21
$-0.12
Q1 25
$-0.11
$-0.14
Q4 24
$-0.13
Q3 24
$-0.20
$-0.08
Q2 24
$-0.19
$-0.14
Q1 24
$-0.20
$-0.14

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
TE
TE
UP
UP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$34.1M
$133.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$547.3M
$671.3M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$96.9M
$-392.1M
Total Assets
$1.4B
$968.8M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
5.65×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
TE
TE
UP
UP
Q4 25
$133.9M
Q3 25
$34.1M
$125.3M
Q2 25
$8.5M
$107.0M
Q1 25
$48.9M
$171.8M
Q4 24
$216.4M
Q3 24
$181.9M
$115.9M
Q2 24
$219.6M
$141.5M
Q1 24
$249.9M
$180.9M
Total Debt
TE
TE
UP
UP
Q4 25
$671.3M
Q3 25
$547.3M
$766.5M
Q2 25
$591.2M
$770.5M
Q1 25
$603.2M
$765.8M
Q4 24
$761.3M
Q3 24
$596.9M
Q2 24
$597.4M
Q1 24
$602.3M
$603.2M
Stockholders' Equity
TE
TE
UP
UP
Q4 25
$-392.1M
Q3 25
$96.9M
$-374.5M
Q2 25
$183.9M
$-347.8M
Q1 25
$201.9M
$-288.1M
Q4 24
$-202.1M
Q3 24
$538.7M
$-117.7M
Q2 24
$561.6M
$-72.2M
Q1 24
$582.3M
$936.0K
Total Assets
TE
TE
UP
UP
Q4 25
$968.8M
Q3 25
$1.4B
$973.0M
Q2 25
$1.4B
$1.0B
Q1 25
$1.4B
$1.1B
Q4 24
$1.2B
Q3 24
$615.0M
$1.0B
Q2 24
$644.4M
$1.1B
Q1 24
$670.3M
$1.2B
Debt / Equity
TE
TE
UP
UP
Q4 25
Q3 25
5.65×
Q2 25
3.21×
Q1 25
2.99×
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
1.03×
644.43×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
TE
TE
UP
UP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$63.9M
$-18.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$55.0M
$-58.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
26.1%
-31.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.2%
21.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-42.3M
$-259.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
TE
TE
UP
UP
Q4 25
$-18.4M
Q3 25
$63.9M
$-37.1M
Q2 25
$33.4M
$-62.9M
Q1 25
$-44.8M
$-47.9M
Q4 24
$37.9M
Q3 24
$-28.4M
$-16.9M
Q2 24
$-28.0M
$-25.2M
Q1 24
$-16.2M
$-73.8M
Free Cash Flow
TE
TE
UP
UP
Q4 25
$-58.3M
Q3 25
$55.0M
$-60.4M
Q2 25
$10.6M
$-78.6M
Q1 25
$-74.0M
$-62.6M
Q4 24
$-70.2M
Q3 24
$-34.0M
$-21.9M
Q2 24
$-35.6M
$-30.8M
Q1 24
$-37.7M
$-77.8M
FCF Margin
TE
TE
UP
UP
Q4 25
-31.7%
Q3 25
26.1%
-32.6%
Q2 25
8.0%
-41.5%
Q1 25
-138.4%
-35.3%
Q4 24
-34.3%
Q3 24
-11.3%
Q2 24
-15.7%
Q1 24
-39.5%
Capex Intensity
TE
TE
UP
UP
Q4 25
21.7%
Q3 25
4.2%
12.5%
Q2 25
17.2%
8.3%
Q1 25
54.5%
8.3%
Q4 24
52.8%
Q3 24
2.6%
Q2 24
2.9%
Q1 24
2.0%

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

TE
TE

Related Party$120.1M57%
Nonrelated Party$90.4M43%

UP
UP

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons