vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC) and UDR, Inc. (UDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TIC Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($508.3M vs $425.8M, roughly 1.2× UDR, Inc.). UDR, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 44.6% vs -9.3%, a 53.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
UDR, Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust specializing in owning, operating, and redeveloping high-quality multifamily residential apartment communities. It operates across major U.S. metropolitan markets, catering to a diverse tenant base including young professionals, families, and middle-to-high income households.
TIC vs UDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $508.3M | $425.8M |
| Net Profit | $-47.2M | $189.8M |
| Gross Margin | 35.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.8% | 54.0% |
| Net Margin | -9.3% | 44.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 0.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 147.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $425.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $508.3M | $433.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $473.9M | $431.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $313.9M | $425.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $234.2M | $421.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $422.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $420.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $415.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $189.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-47.2M | $222.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.9M | $40.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-233.0K | $37.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-25.8M | $76.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $28.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 54.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | 64.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.4% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.0% | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 44.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -9.3% | 51.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.0% | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -220.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.63 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $439.5M | $1.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $10.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.74× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $439.5M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.1M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $155.7M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $751.3M | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $752.4M | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $10.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | 1.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.83× | 1.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.64× | 1.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.67× | 1.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.55× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $37.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $61.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.7M | $902.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $234.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.5M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.8M | $156.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $876.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $230.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $238.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $37.1M | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $164.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.5M | $190.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $103.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $627.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $171.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | 150.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.6% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.1% | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 148.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 58.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 12.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |
UDR
| Rental income | $423.3M | 99% |
| Joint venture management and other fees | $2.5M | 1% |
