vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INTERFACE INC (TILE) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.1M vs $349.4M, roughly 1.8× INTERFACE INC). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 7.0%, a 6.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 4.3%). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.3M vs $28.6M). Over the past eight quarters, INTERFACE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 4.6%).
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
TILE vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $349.4M | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $24.4M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | 38.6% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.3% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.1% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.41 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $349.4M | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.5M | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $375.5M | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $297.4M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $335.0M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $344.3M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $346.6M | $597.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $289.7M | $570.9M |
| Q4 25 | $24.4M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.1M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.6M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.6M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.2M | $72.6M |
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.4% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.4% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.3% | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.5% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.1% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.4% | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | 46.9% |
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.4% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.41 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.78 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.55 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.38 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.38 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.24 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $71.3M | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $181.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $640.7M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.28× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $71.3M | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $187.4M | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.7M | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.8M | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.2M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.6M | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.2M | $279.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $89.8M | $237.1M |
| Q4 25 | $181.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $304.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $302.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $387.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $391.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $640.7M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $621.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $575.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $489.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $501.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $451.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $428.5M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.91× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.6M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.9% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.02× | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $121.7M | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.3M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.7M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.0M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.2M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.6M | $45.6M |
| Q4 25 | $28.6M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.1M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.8M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.4M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.7M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | $35.5M |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.02× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.66× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.93× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.75× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.68× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.89× | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
WTS
Segment breakdown not available.