vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) and Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LendingTree, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($327.3M vs $183.8M, roughly 1.8× Wheels Up Experience Inc.). LendingTree, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs -15.7%, a 21.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LendingTree, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.4% vs -10.2%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingTree, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs -3.4%).

LendingTree, Inc. is an online lending marketplace, founded in 1996 and headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. The business platform allows potential borrowers to connect with multiple loan operators to find optimal terms for loans, credit cards, deposit accounts, insurance, etc. LendingTree allows borrowers to shop and compare competitive rates and terms across an array of financial products. Other additional services include financing tools, comparative loan searches and borrowing info...

Wheels Up is a provider of "on demand" private aviation in the United States and one of the largest private aviation companies in the world. It was founded in 2013 by Kenny Dichter, using a membership/on-demand business model. Wheels Up members can book private aircraft from the company fleet and third-party operators using a mobile application.

TREE vs UP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TREE
TREE
1.8× larger
TREE
$327.3M
$183.8M
UP
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TREE
TREE
+12.6% gap
TREE
2.4%
-10.2%
UP
Higher net margin
TREE
TREE
21.0% more per $
TREE
5.3%
-15.7%
UP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TREE
TREE
Annualised
TREE
24.8%
-3.4%
UP

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Revenue
$327.3M
$183.8M
Net Profit
$17.3M
$-28.9M
Gross Margin
100.0%
14.3%
Operating Margin
9.5%
-0.9%
Net Margin
5.3%
-15.7%
Revenue YoY
2.4%
-10.2%
Net Profit YoY
239.5%
67.0%
EPS (diluted)
$1.22
$-0.04

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
$327.3M
Q4 25
$319.7M
$183.8M
Q3 25
$307.8M
$185.5M
Q2 25
$250.1M
$189.6M
Q1 25
$239.7M
$177.5M
Q4 24
$261.5M
$204.8M
Q3 24
$260.8M
$193.9M
Q2 24
$210.1M
$196.3M
Net Profit
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
$17.3M
Q4 25
$144.7M
$-28.9M
Q3 25
$10.2M
$-83.7M
Q2 25
$8.9M
$-82.3M
Q1 25
$-12.4M
$-99.3M
Q4 24
$7.5M
$-87.5M
Q3 24
$-58.0M
$-57.7M
Q2 24
$7.8M
$-97.0M
Gross Margin
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
100.0%
Q4 25
29.2%
14.3%
Q3 25
30.7%
6.8%
Q2 25
34.0%
8.3%
Q1 25
32.9%
10.8%
Q4 24
33.6%
13.9%
Q3 24
30.2%
13.9%
Q2 24
34.5%
2.3%
Operating Margin
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
9.5%
Q4 25
7.0%
-0.9%
Q3 25
9.3%
-33.1%
Q2 25
8.4%
-31.4%
Q1 25
-3.0%
-45.5%
Q4 24
6.9%
-26.0%
Q3 24
3.8%
-21.6%
Q2 24
4.6%
-40.3%
Net Margin
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
5.3%
Q4 25
45.2%
-15.7%
Q3 25
3.3%
-45.1%
Q2 25
3.5%
-43.4%
Q1 25
-5.2%
-55.9%
Q4 24
2.9%
-42.7%
Q3 24
-22.2%
-29.8%
Q2 24
3.7%
-49.4%
EPS (diluted)
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
$1.22
Q4 25
$10.32
$-0.04
Q3 25
$0.73
$-0.12
Q2 25
$0.65
$-0.12
Q1 25
$-0.92
$-0.14
Q4 24
$0.54
$-0.13
Q3 24
$-4.34
$-0.08
Q2 24
$0.58
$-0.14

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$85.5M
$133.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$390.9M
$671.3M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$304.7M
$-392.1M
Total Assets
$863.9M
$968.8M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.28×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
$85.5M
Q4 25
$81.1M
$133.9M
Q3 25
$68.6M
$125.3M
Q2 25
$149.1M
$107.0M
Q1 25
$126.4M
$171.8M
Q4 24
$106.6M
$216.4M
Q3 24
$96.8M
$115.9M
Q2 24
$66.8M
$141.5M
Total Debt
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
$390.9M
Q4 25
$387.7M
$671.3M
Q3 25
$388.4M
$766.5M
Q2 25
$385.1M
$770.5M
Q1 25
$387.7M
$765.8M
Q4 24
$344.1M
$761.3M
Q3 24
$346.2M
$596.9M
Q2 24
$467.7M
$597.4M
Stockholders' Equity
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
$304.7M
Q4 25
$286.8M
$-392.1M
Q3 25
$132.4M
$-374.5M
Q2 25
$118.1M
$-347.8M
Q1 25
$103.7M
$-288.1M
Q4 24
$108.8M
$-202.1M
Q3 24
$94.3M
$-117.7M
Q2 24
$145.8M
$-72.2M
Total Assets
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
$863.9M
Q4 25
$855.7M
$968.8M
Q3 25
$759.9M
$973.0M
Q2 25
$835.8M
$1.0B
Q1 25
$777.1M
$1.1B
Q4 24
$767.7M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$787.2M
$1.0B
Q2 24
$802.2M
$1.1B
Debt / Equity
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
1.28×
Q4 25
1.35×
Q3 25
2.93×
Q2 25
3.26×
Q1 25
3.74×
Q4 24
3.16×
Q3 24
3.67×
Q2 24
3.21×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-18.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-58.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-31.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.8%
21.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-259.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$73.1M
$-18.4M
Q3 25
$28.8M
$-37.1M
Q2 25
$28.0M
$-62.9M
Q1 25
$-210.0K
$-47.9M
Q4 24
$62.3M
$37.9M
Q3 24
$45.3M
$-16.9M
Q2 24
$-4.9M
$-25.2M
Free Cash Flow
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$60.7M
$-58.3M
Q3 25
$25.6M
$-60.4M
Q2 25
$25.2M
$-78.6M
Q1 25
$-3.6M
$-62.6M
Q4 24
$51.0M
$-70.2M
Q3 24
$42.3M
$-21.9M
Q2 24
$-7.7M
$-30.8M
FCF Margin
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
Q4 25
19.0%
-31.7%
Q3 25
8.3%
-32.6%
Q2 25
10.1%
-41.5%
Q1 25
-1.5%
-35.3%
Q4 24
19.5%
-34.3%
Q3 24
16.2%
-11.3%
Q2 24
-3.7%
-15.7%
Capex Intensity
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
0.8%
Q4 25
3.9%
21.7%
Q3 25
1.1%
12.5%
Q2 25
1.1%
8.3%
Q1 25
1.4%
8.3%
Q4 24
4.3%
52.8%
Q3 24
1.1%
2.6%
Q2 24
1.3%
2.9%
Cash Conversion
TREE
TREE
UP
UP
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.51×
Q3 25
2.84×
Q2 25
3.15×
Q1 25
Q4 24
8.29×
Q3 24
Q2 24
-0.64×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

TREE
TREE

Insurance segment$221.9M68%
Consumer segment$66.3M20%
Home segment$39.1M12%

UP
UP

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons