vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD (TSEM) and Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($351.2M vs $341.0M, roughly 1.0× Utz Brands, Inc.). TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD runs the higher net margin — 15.2% vs 0.7%, a 14.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.7% vs -3.1%).
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. is an Israeli company that manufactures integrated circuits using specialty process technologies, including SiGe, BiCMOS, Silicon Photonics, SOI, mixed-signal and RFCMOS, CMOS image sensors, non-imaging sensors, power management (BCD), and non-volatile memory (NVM) as well as MEMS capabilities. Tower Semiconductor also owns 51% of TPSCo, an enterprise with Nuvoton Technology Corporation Japan (NTCJ).
Utz Brands, Inc., more commonly known as Utz, is an American snack food company based in Hanover, Pennsylvania. The company produces a variety of potato chips, pretzels, and other snacks, with most products sold under their family of brands. Utz is also a snack supplier to warehouse clubs and merchandisers.
TSEM vs UTZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $351.2M | $341.0M |
| Net Profit | $53.4M | $2.3M |
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | 25.5% |
| Operating Margin | 15.7% | 2.1% |
| Net Margin | 15.2% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.7% | -3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.4% | 108.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.48 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 24 | — | $341.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $351.2M | $356.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $346.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $371.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $362.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | $357.2M | $351.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | $426.2M | — |
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.4M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | $51.2M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | $58.1M | — |
| Q4 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.8% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | 24.2% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 22 | 26.4% | — |
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | 14.1% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 22 | 16.6% | — |
| Q4 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.2% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | 14.3% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 22 | 13.6% | — |
| Q4 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.48 | $0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 23 | $0.46 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 22 | $0.53 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $265.3M | $56.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $768.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.5B | $696.9M |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 24 | — | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $64.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $265.3M | $66.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $60.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $73.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $318.2M | $57.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | $211.2M | — |
| Q4 24 | — | $768.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $780.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $797.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $756.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $915.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $967.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $178.9M | $929.3M | ||
| Q2 22 | $200.7M | — |
| Q4 24 | — | $696.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $685.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $686.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $671.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $705.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $688.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.0B | $692.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | $1.7B | — |
| Q4 24 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 22 | $2.3B | — |
| Q4 24 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.09× | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.12× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $54.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $16.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 24 | — | $54.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $52.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $53.4M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 24 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-22.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $37.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-12.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-22.3M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -6.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 24 | — | 23.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 3.34× | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
