vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) and Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Utz Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($341.0M vs $249.2M, roughly 1.4× ServiceTitan, Inc.). Utz Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.7% vs -15.9%, a 16.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ServiceTitan, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.0% vs -3.1%). ServiceTitan, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($42.2M vs $16.5M).
Alphabet Inc. is an American multinational technology conglomerate holding company headquartered in Mountain View, California. It was created through a restructuring of Google on October 2, 2015, and became the parent holding company of Google and several former Google subsidiaries. Alphabet is listed on the large-cap section of the Nasdaq under the ticker symbols GOOGL and GOOG; both classes of stock are components of major stock market indices such as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100. Alphabet ha...
Utz Brands, Inc., more commonly known as Utz, is an American snack food company based in Hanover, Pennsylvania. The company produces a variety of potato chips, pretzels, and other snacks, with most products sold under their family of brands. Utz is also a snack supplier to warehouse clubs and merchandisers.
TTAN vs UTZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $249.2M | $341.0M |
| Net Profit | $-39.5M | $2.3M |
| Gross Margin | 70.8% | 25.5% |
| Operating Margin | -16.9% | 2.1% |
| Net Margin | -15.9% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 25.0% | -3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.9% | 108.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.42 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $249.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $209.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.3M | $341.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.3M | $356.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $346.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-39.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-32.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-46.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-100.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.5M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-56.0M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | 70.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.2% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.5% |
| Q4 25 | -16.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -47.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | -15.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -48.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.9% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.42 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.51 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.34 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.74 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.02 | $0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $493.2M | $56.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $103.6M | $768.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $696.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.07× | 1.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $493.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $471.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $441.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.8M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $64.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.2M | $66.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.0M |
| Q4 25 | $103.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $174.2M | $768.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $780.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $797.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $756.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-576.8M | $696.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $685.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-506.0M | $686.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $671.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.13× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $43.8M | $54.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $42.2M | $16.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.9% | 4.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 11.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $43.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.5M | $54.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $52.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.2M | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $42.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.5M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.9M | $-15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-22.7M |
| Q4 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.7% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TTAN
| Subscription Revenue | $182.8M | 73% |
| Usage Revenue | $56.8M | 23% |
| Professional Services And Other Revenue | $9.6M | 4% |
UTZ
Segment breakdown not available.
