vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.1M vs $570.0M, roughly 1.1× TTEC Holdings, Inc.). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs -29.9%, a 43.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 0.4%). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.3M vs $-9.2M). Over the past eight quarters, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs -0.6%).
TTEC Holdings, Inc., is an American customer experience technology and services company with its primary place of business in Austin, Texas.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
TTEC vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $570.0M | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $-170.5M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | -30.3% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | -29.9% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3791.9% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.57 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $570.0M | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $519.1M | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $513.6M | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $534.2M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.4M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $529.4M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $534.1M | $597.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $576.6M | $570.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-170.5M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.4M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.0M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.1M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-299.5M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.3M | $72.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 46.9% |
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -42.0% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.9% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | -29.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.6% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.1% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.4% | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.57 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.17 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.44 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.30 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $82.9M | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $112.9M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $82.9M | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.5M | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.6M | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.1M | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.0M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.9M | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $279.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $91.5M | $237.1M |
| Q4 25 | $112.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $280.8M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $295.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $281.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $268.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $304.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $612.4M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $2.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.6M | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-9.2M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $83.0M | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.7M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.6M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-91.4M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.3M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.6M | $45.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.2M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.6M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.5M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.8M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-100.2M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.1M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.1M | $35.5M |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.7% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.0% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.60× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.24× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TTEC
| Ttec Engage | $444.5M | 78% |
| Ttec Digital | $125.5M | 22% |
WTS
Segment breakdown not available.
