vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of UDR, Inc. (UDR) and VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VinFast Auto Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($718.6M vs $433.1M, roughly 1.7× UDR, Inc.). UDR, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 51.5% vs -2.8%, a 54.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
UDR, Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust specializing in owning, operating, and redeveloping high-quality multifamily residential apartment communities. It operates across major U.S. metropolitan markets, catering to a diverse tenant base including young professionals, families, and middle-to-high income households.
VinFast Auto Ltd. is a Vietnamese multinational automotive company founded by Vingroup, one of the largest private conglomerates in Vietnam that was founded by Phạm Nhật Vượng.
UDR vs VFS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $433.1M | $718.6M |
| Net Profit | $222.9M | $-20.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 64.1% | -96.1% |
| Net Margin | 51.5% | -2.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 4519.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.67 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $433.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $431.9M | $718.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $425.4M | $663.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.9M | $656.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $420.2M | $511.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $413.6M | $302.6M |
| Q4 25 | $222.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.4M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.7M | $-51.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.7M | $-26.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.6M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.1M | $-618.3M |
| Q4 25 | 64.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | -96.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.2% | -79.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.0% | -74.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.6% | -65.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.3% | -139.4% |
| Q4 25 | 51.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | -7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -220.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.4% | -204.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.67 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2M | $8.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3B | — |
| Total Assets | $10.6B | $183.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.77× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $650.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $-7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.6B | $183.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.6B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.7B | $158.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.1B | $151.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2B | $145.6M |
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.47× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $902.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $650.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 150.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 58.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.05× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.1B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $902.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $234.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $250.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $156.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $876.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $238.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $650.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $627.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $115.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 150.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 148.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 58.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.05× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.81× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.64× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.26× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.88× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
UDR
Segment breakdown not available.
VFS
| Sales of vehicles | $662.9M | 92% |
| Sales of spare parts and components | $41.3M | 6% |
| Revenue from leasing activities | $12.3M | 2% |
| Finance income | $2.4M | 0% |
| Rendering of services | $1.2M | 0% |
