vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ) and VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VinFast Auto Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($718.6M vs $361.3M, roughly 2.0× Utz Brands, Inc.).
Utz Brands, Inc., more commonly known as Utz, is an American snack food company based in Hanover, Pennsylvania. The company produces a variety of potato chips, pretzels, and other snacks, with most products sold under their family of brands. Utz is also a snack supplier to warehouse clubs and merchandisers.
VinFast Auto Ltd. is a Vietnamese multinational automotive company founded by Vingroup, one of the largest private conglomerates in Vietnam that was founded by Phạm Nhật Vượng.
UTZ vs VFS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2027 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $361.3M | $718.6M |
| Net Profit | — | $-20.0M |
| Gross Margin | 25.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | -96.1% |
| Net Margin | — | -2.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $361.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $718.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $663.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $656.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $365.5M | $511.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $356.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $346.5M | $302.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-51.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-26.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $-618.3M |
| Q1 26 | 25.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -96.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -79.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -74.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | -65.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | -139.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.2% | -204.3% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $73.7M | $8.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $709.5M | — |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $183.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $73.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $650.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.9M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.0M | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $768.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $780.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $797.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $756.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | $709.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $696.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $685.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $686.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $671.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $183.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $158.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $151.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $145.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.13× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-12.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-12.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-22.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.67× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
UTZ
Segment breakdown not available.
VFS
| Sales of vehicles | $662.9M | 92% |
| Sales of spare parts and components | $41.3M | 6% |
| Revenue from leasing activities | $12.3M | 2% |
| Finance income | $2.4M | 0% |
| Rendering of services | $1.2M | 0% |