vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Vera Bradley, Inc. (VRA) and WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION (WABC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($63.3M vs $62.3M, roughly 1.0× Vera Bradley, Inc.). WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION runs the higher net margin — 43.9% vs -19.9%, a 63.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-9.0% vs -22.7%). WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION produced more free cash flow last quarter ($119.7M vs $-4.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Vera Bradley, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Vera Bradley Sales, LLC is an American luggage and handbag design company, founded by Barbara Bradley Baekgaard and Patricia R. Miller in 1982. As of 2019, its home office is in Fort Wayne, Indiana. The company was named after Baekgaard's mother. Its original luxury cotton bag product lines have expanded to include fashion and home accessories, office supplies, and patterned gifts. Many items have distinctive florals, paisleys, or geometric prints with complementary linings, as well as elonga...
Westamerica Bancorporation is a regional bank holding company headquartered in California, U.S. It operates via its wholly owned banking subsidiary to provide full-spectrum retail and commercial banking services, including deposit products, business and consumer loans, wealth management, and payment services, primarily serving individual consumers, SMEs and local institutional clients in northern and central California.
VRA vs WABC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.3M | $63.3M |
| Net Profit | $-12.4M | $27.8M |
| Gross Margin | 42.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -19.6% | 59.8% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | 43.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -22.7% | -9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | -12.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.44 | $1.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $62.3M | $63.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.9M | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.7M | $64.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.0M | $66.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.5M | $69.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $94.0M | $74.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.9M | $74.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.2M | $75.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $27.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.7M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-33.5M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.0M | $31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.8M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.1M | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.9M | $36.4M |
| Q4 25 | 42.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 54.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -19.6% | 59.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.5% | 59.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.6% | 60.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -23.3% | 63.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.6% | 62.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 64.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.6% | 64.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.6% | 65.2% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.6% | 44.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -64.8% | 45.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -47.0% | 46.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.2% | 45.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.1% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.0% | 47.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.0% | 48.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.44 | $1.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.17 | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.20 | $1.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.62 | $1.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.26 | $1.33 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $1.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $128.1M | $933.5M |
| Total Assets | $243.7M | $6.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.08× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $128.1M | $933.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.5M | $931.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $146.0M | $921.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.0M | $923.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.2M | $890.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $242.5M | $909.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $245.9M | $815.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $259.9M | $791.7M |
| Q4 25 | $243.7M | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.2M | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.9M | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $306.7M | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $359.0M | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.2M | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $368.7M | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $380.8M | $6.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.0M | $121.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.5M | $119.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.2% | 189.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.38× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-13.0M | $213.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.0M | $121.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.4M | $29.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.9M | $23.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.7M | $42.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.6M | $141.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.5M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.9M | $52.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.5M | $119.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.1M | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.8M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.0M | $139.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $40.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.4M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.7M | $52.1M |
| Q4 25 | -7.2% | 189.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.7% | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -38.3% | 35.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 63.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.5% | 201.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.5% | 54.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.7% | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.7% | 68.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.25× | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.43× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
VRA
| Bags | $23.9M | 38% |
| Indirect | $12.6M | 20% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $12.2M | 20% |
| Accessories | $7.2M | 12% |
| Home | $3.5M | 6% |
| Apparel Footwear | $1.8M | 3% |
| Other Products | $1.5M | 2% |
WABC
Segment breakdown not available.
