vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) and Zoetis (ZTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zoetis is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.5× Zebra Technologies). Zoetis runs the higher net margin — 26.6% vs 9.0%, a 17.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zebra Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs 2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Zebra Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.8% CAGR vs -2.1%).
Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBR), commonly known as Zebra, is an American multinational technology conglomerate corporation specializing in smart data capture systems. Zebra is headquartered in Lincolnshire, Illinois outside of Chicago with 10,700 employees across 57 countries.
Zoetis Inc. (/zō-EH-tis/) is an American drug company, the world's largest producer of medicine and vaccinations for pets and livestock. The company was a subsidiary of Pfizer, the world's largest drug maker, but with Pfizer's spinoff of its 83% interest in the firm it is now a completely independent company. The company directly markets its products in approximately 45 countries, and sells them in more than 100 countries. Operations outside the United States accounted for 50% of the total re...
ZBRA vs ZTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $2.3B |
| Net Profit | $135.0M | $601.0M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 71.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.0% | 26.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.3% | 2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -0.7% | -0.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.72 | $1.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $135.0M | $601.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $70.0M | $603.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.0M | $721.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $112.0M | $718.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.0M | $631.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.0M | $581.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.0M | $682.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.0M | $624.0M |
| Q1 26 | 49.6% | 71.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 47.3% | 70.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.0% | 71.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.6% | 73.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.3% | 72.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.6% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.8% | 70.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.4% | 71.7% |
| Q1 26 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.4% | 31.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | 36.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.9% | 36.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.7% | 33.0% |
| Q1 26 | 9.0% | 26.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.2% | 25.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.9% | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 26.4% |
| Q1 26 | $2.72 | $1.42 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.40 | $1.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.97 | $1.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.19 | $1.61 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.62 | $1.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.14 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.64 | $1.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.17 | $1.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $114.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | — |
| Total Assets | $8.3B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.76× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $114.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $125.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $872.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $879.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $901.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $676.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $411.0M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $5.0B |
| Q1 26 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.5B | $15.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1B | $15.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9B | $14.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9B | $14.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | $14.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7B | $14.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5B | $14.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.66× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $176.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.30× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $176.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $357.0M | $893.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $235.0M | $938.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $147.0M | $486.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.0M | $587.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $306.0M | $905.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $294.0M | $951.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $288.0M | $502.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $327.0M | $732.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.0M | $805.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.0M | $308.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $158.0M | $438.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $288.0M | $689.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.0M | $784.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $278.0M | $370.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.2% | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.4% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.1% | 19.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.6% | 29.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | 15.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.10× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.33× | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.31× | 0.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.31× | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.88× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.15× | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.55× | 0.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ZBRA
| Tangible products | $1.2B | 82% |
| Services and software | $264.0M | 18% |
ZTS
| Companion Animal | $1.5B | 67% |
| Livestock | $720.0M | 32% |
| Contract Manufacturing & Human Health | $23.0M | 1% |
