vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CITY HOLDING CO (CHCO) and Pony AI Inc. (PONY), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Jam City, Inc. is an American video game developer and publisher based in Culver City, California. The company was founded in 2010 by Chris DeWolfe, Colin Digiaro, Aber Whitcomb, and Josh Yguado. Jam City has nine studios located in the United States, Canada, South America, and Europe. As of 2021, it employs 825 people. Netmarble is the largest shareholder in Jam City. As of 2021, Jam City's games have 31 million monthly active users and 1.3 billion total downloads.
Pony Canyon Inc. , also known by the shorthand form Ponican , is a Japanese company, established on October 1, 1966, which distributes music, films, home video, and video games. It is affiliated with the Japanese media group Fujisankei Communications Group. Pony Canyon is a major leader in the music industry in Japan, with its artists regularly at the top of the Japanese charts. Pony Canyon is also responsible for releasing taped concerts from its artists as well as many anime productions and...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $60.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 65.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 66.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 66.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 52.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 53.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.17 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.41 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.29 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.94 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.02 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.96 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.97 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
