vs
中国移动（BEEP）与Laird Superfood, Inc.（LSF）财务数据对比。点击上方公司名可切换其他公司
Laird Superfood, Inc.的季度营收约是中国移动的1.7倍（$13.3M vs $7.9M），Laird Superfood, Inc.同比增速更快（15.0% vs -3.7%），过去两年Laird Superfood, Inc.的营收复合增速更高（16.1% vs -7.5%）
中国移动通信集团是中国的国有特大型电信企业，面向中国大陆及香港地区提供移动通信服务，旗下中国移动有限公司以“中国移动”为品牌开展业务，拥有覆盖全国的移动通信网络，截至2021年6月，用户规模达9.455亿，是中国用户规模最大的移动运营商，位列福布斯全球2000强第25位。
Laird Superfood是一家主营植物基功能性超级食品的企业，产品涵盖精品咖啡奶精、补水混合饮品、营养补充剂、植物能量零食等，面向健康意识较强的消费群体，主要在北美市场通过电商及线下零售渠道销售，主打可持续采购的清洁配方。
BEEP vs LSF — 直观对比
营收规模更大
LSF
是对方的1.7倍
$7.9M
营收增速更快
LSF
高出18.7%
-3.7%
两年增速更快
LSF
近两年复合增速
-7.5%
损益表 — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| 指标 | | |
|---|---|---|
| 营收 | $7.9M | $13.3M |
| 净利润 | — | $-1.8M |
| 毛利率 | — | 34.1% |
| 营业利润率 | — | -13.5% |
| 净利率 | — | -13.2% |
| 营收同比 | -3.7% | 15.0% |
| 净利润同比 | — | -341.4% |
| 每股收益（稀释后） | — | — |
绿色 = 该指标领先。财年不对齐时期间可能不同
8季度营收与利润趋势
并排季度历史对比，按日历期对齐，财年错位的公司也能正确匹配
营收BEEPLSF
| Q1 26 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.1M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.8M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3M | $10.0M |
净利润BEEPLSF
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.5M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.3M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-999.0K | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.4M | $-239.1K |
毛利率BEEPLSF
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% |
营业利润率BEEPLSF
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.4% |
净利率BEEPLSF
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -85.6% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -63.9% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -47.3% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -47.2% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.9% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.4% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.6% | -2.4% |
资产负债表与财务实力
最新季度各公司的流动性、杠杆与账面价值一览
| 指标 | | |
|---|---|---|
| 现金及短期投资手头流动性 | $8.5M | $5.1M |
| 总债务越低越好 | — | — |
| 股东权益账面价值 | $150.1M | $11.5M |
| 总资产 | $362.8M | $19.2M |
| 负债/权益比越低杠杆越低 | — | — |
8季度趋势，按日历期对齐
现金及短期投资BEEPLSF
| Q1 26 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.3M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.6M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7M | $7.6M |
总债务BEEPLSF
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $198.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $183.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $186.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $187.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $188.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.6M | — |
股东权益BEEPLSF
| Q1 26 | $150.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $141.3M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $160.6M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.8M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.4M | $12.6M |
总资产BEEPLSF
| Q1 26 | $362.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $382.5M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $397.8M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $405.6M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $409.5M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $415.1M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $418.2M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $417.1M | $18.0M |
负债/权益比BEEPLSF
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | — |
现金流与资本效率
扣除再投资后实际产生的现金。现金流比净利润更难造假
| 指标 | | |
|---|---|---|
| 经营现金流最新季度 | — | $68.4K |
| 自由现金流经营现金流 - 资本支出 | — | — |
| 自由现金流率自由现金流/营收 | — | — |
| 资本支出强度资本支出/营收 | — | — |
| 现金转化率经营现金流/净利润 | — | — |
| 过去12个月自由现金流最近4个季度 | — | — |
8季度趋势，按日历期对齐
经营现金流BEEPLSF
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $848.0K | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-784.0K | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $346.0K | $642.7K |
财务流量对比
营收 → 毛利润 → 营业利润 → 净利润流向图
业务分部营收拆解
BEEP
| Managed property revenue | $6.6M | 83% |
| Base rental income | $1.1M | 14% |
| Percentage rental income | $219.0K | 3% |
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
