vs

孩之宝(HAS)与KEMPER Corp(KMPR)财务数据对比。点击上方公司名可切换其他公司

孩之宝的季度营收约是KEMPER Corp的1.3倍($1.4B vs $1.1B),孩之宝净利率更高(13.9% vs -0.7%,领先14.6%),孩之宝同比增速更快(31.3% vs -4.7%),孩之宝自由现金流更多($389.5M vs $166.2M),过去两年孩之宝的营收复合增速更高(38.2% vs -0.5%)

孩之宝是1923年12月6日成立的美国跨国玩具制造与娱乐控股企业,总部位于罗德岛州波塔基特。旗下拥有Kenner、米尔顿·布拉德利、派克兄弟、威世智等知名品牌,持有大量热门IP商标权,业务覆盖玩具生产、游戏开发、娱乐内容出品等多个领域。

坎伯公司(Kemper Corporation)是总部位于美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥的保险服务商,总资产近130亿美元,旗下品牌矩阵为个人、家庭及企业客户提供多元保险产品服务。

HAS vs KMPR — 直观对比

营收规模更大
HAS
HAS
是对方的1.3倍
HAS
$1.4B
$1.1B
KMPR
营收增速更快
HAS
HAS
高出35.9%
HAS
31.3%
-4.7%
KMPR
净利率更高
HAS
HAS
高出14.6%
HAS
13.9%
-0.7%
KMPR
自由现金流更多
HAS
HAS
多$223.3M
HAS
$389.5M
$166.2M
KMPR
两年增速更快
HAS
HAS
近两年复合增速
HAS
38.2%
-0.5%
KMPR

损益表 — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

指标
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
营收
$1.4B
$1.1B
净利润
$201.6M
$-8.0M
毛利率
68.7%
营业利润率
20.6%
净利率
13.9%
-0.7%
营收同比
31.3%
-4.7%
净利润同比
687.8%
-108.2%
每股收益(稀释后)
$1.46
$-0.03

绿色 = 该指标领先。财年不对齐时期间可能不同

8季度营收与利润趋势

并排季度历史对比,按日历期对齐,财年错位的公司也能正确匹配

营收
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
$1.4B
$1.1B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$980.8M
$1.2B
Q1 25
$887.1M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$995.3M
$1.1B
Q1 24
$757.3M
$1.1B
净利润
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
$201.6M
$-8.0M
Q3 25
$233.2M
$-21.0M
Q2 25
$-855.8M
$72.6M
Q1 25
$98.6M
$99.7M
Q4 24
$-34.3M
$97.4M
Q3 24
$223.2M
$73.7M
Q2 24
$138.5M
$75.4M
Q1 24
$58.2M
$71.3M
毛利率
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
68.7%
Q3 25
70.1%
Q2 25
77.0%
Q1 25
76.9%
Q4 24
67.4%
Q3 24
70.4%
Q2 24
76.1%
Q1 24
73.0%
营业利润率
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
20.6%
Q3 25
24.6%
Q2 25
-81.4%
Q1 25
19.2%
Q4 24
5.4%
Q3 24
23.6%
11.2%
Q2 24
21.3%
10.1%
Q1 24
15.3%
7.6%
净利率
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
13.9%
-0.7%
Q3 25
16.8%
-1.7%
Q2 25
-87.3%
5.9%
Q1 25
11.1%
8.4%
Q4 24
-3.1%
8.2%
Q3 24
17.4%
6.3%
Q2 24
13.9%
6.7%
Q1 24
7.7%
6.2%
每股收益(稀释后)
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
$1.46
$-0.03
Q3 25
$1.64
$-0.34
Q2 25
$-6.10
$1.12
Q1 25
$0.70
$1.54
Q4 24
$-0.25
$1.51
Q3 24
$1.59
$1.14
Q2 24
$0.99
$1.16
Q1 24
$0.42
$1.10

资产负债表与财务实力

最新季度各公司的流动性、杠杆与账面价值一览

指标
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
现金及短期投资手头流动性
总债务越低越好
$943.5M
股东权益账面价值
$565.5M
$2.7B
总资产
$5.6B
$12.5B
负债/权益比越低杠杆越低
0.35×

8季度趋势,按日历期对齐

现金及短期投资
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
Q3 25
$371.2M
Q2 25
$407.6M
Q1 25
$545.3M
Q4 24
$1.0B
Q3 24
$696.9M
Q2 24
$539.1M
Q1 24
$520.7M
总债务
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
$943.5M
Q3 25
$943.1M
Q2 25
$942.6M
Q1 25
$942.1M
Q4 24
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.4B
Q1 24
$1.4B
股东权益
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
$565.5M
$2.7B
Q3 25
$433.8M
$2.7B
Q2 25
$269.7M
$370.0M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$366.0M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$2.8B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$2.8B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$358.0M
Q1 24
$1.0B
$2.6B
总资产
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
$5.6B
$12.5B
Q3 25
$5.5B
$12.4B
Q2 25
$5.2B
$12.6B
Q1 25
$6.0B
$12.5B
Q4 24
$6.3B
$12.6B
Q3 24
$7.2B
$12.6B
Q2 24
$6.9B
$12.6B
Q1 24
$6.2B
$12.6B
负债/权益比
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
0.35×
Q3 25
0.35×
Q2 25
2.55×
Q1 25
2.57×
Q4 24
0.50×
Q3 24
0.50×
Q2 24
3.88×
Q1 24
0.54×

现金流与资本效率

扣除再投资后实际产生的现金。现金流比净利润更难造假

指标
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
经营现金流最新季度
$403.2M
$175.0M
自由现金流经营现金流 - 资本支出
$389.5M
$166.2M
自由现金流率自由现金流/营收
26.9%
14.7%
资本支出强度资本支出/营收
0.9%
0.8%
现金转化率经营现金流/净利润
2.00×
过去12个月自由现金流最近4个季度
$829.9M
$553.9M

8季度趋势,按日历期对齐

经营现金流
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
$403.2M
$175.0M
Q3 25
$280.6M
$139.9M
Q2 25
$71.3M
$89.6M
Q1 25
$138.1M
$180.0M
Q4 24
$259.8M
$175.1M
Q3 24
$222.5M
$141.9M
Q2 24
$187.3M
$22.9M
Q1 24
$177.8M
$43.0M
自由现金流
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
$389.5M
$166.2M
Q3 25
$260.9M
$133.4M
Q2 25
$55.2M
$82.0M
Q1 25
$124.3M
$172.3M
Q4 24
$200.8M
$165.4M
Q3 24
$174.0M
$131.4M
Q2 24
$135.4M
$5.2M
Q1 24
$132.0M
$27.7M
自由现金流率
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
26.9%
14.7%
Q3 25
18.8%
10.8%
Q2 25
5.6%
6.7%
Q1 25
14.0%
14.4%
Q4 24
18.2%
13.9%
Q3 24
13.6%
11.1%
Q2 24
13.6%
0.5%
Q1 24
17.4%
2.4%
资本支出强度
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
0.9%
0.8%
Q3 25
1.4%
0.5%
Q2 25
1.6%
0.6%
Q1 25
1.6%
0.6%
Q4 24
5.4%
0.8%
Q3 24
3.8%
0.9%
Q2 24
5.2%
1.6%
Q1 24
6.0%
1.3%
现金转化率
HAS
HAS
KMPR
KMPR
Q4 25
2.00×
Q3 25
1.20×
Q2 25
1.23×
Q1 25
1.40×
1.81×
Q4 24
1.80×
Q3 24
1.00×
1.93×
Q2 24
1.35×
0.30×
Q1 24
3.05×
0.60×

财务流量对比

营收 → 毛利润 → 营业利润 → 净利润流向图

业务分部营收拆解

HAS
HAS

Grow Brands$1.1B75%
Optimize Brands$188.7M13%
Digital And Licensing Gaming$135.7M9%
Class Of Principal Product Family Brands$13.1M1%
Filmand TV$2.4M0%

KMPR
KMPR

Specialty Property Casualty Insurance Segment$995.1M88%
Life Insurance Segment1$140.7M12%

相关对比