vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Horizon Technology Finance Corp (HTFB) and Ibotta, Inc. (IBTA), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TCL Technology Group Corp. is a Chinese partially state-owned electronics company headquartered in Huizhou, Guangdong province. TCL develops, manufactures, and sells consumer electronics like television sets, mobile phones, air conditioners, washing machines, refrigerators, and small electrical appliances. In 2010, it was the world's 25th-largest consumer electronics producer. On 7 February 2020, TCL Corporation changed its name to TCL Technology. It was the second-largest television manufact...
Ibotta, Inc. is an American mobile technology company headquartered in Denver, Colorado. Founded in 2011, the company offers cash back rewards on various purchases through its Ibotta Performance Network and direct to consumer app. Ibotta partners with CPG brands and network publishers to provide these rewards. As of 2024, the company operates solely in the United States. The company's rewards-as-a-service offering, the Ibotta Performance Network, went live in 2022.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $88.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $86.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $84.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $98.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $98.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $87.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $82.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $555.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-34.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 78.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 79.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 79.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 84.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 86.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -38.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.51 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.32 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.33 |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
