vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AECOM (ACM) and UGI CORP (UGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AECOM is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.9× UGI CORP). UGI CORP runs the higher net margin — 14.4% vs 1.9%, a 12.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UGI CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.9% vs 1.6%). AECOM produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.9M vs $-155.0M). Over the past eight quarters, AECOM's revenue compounded faster (-1.4% CAGR vs -7.5%).
AECOM is an American multinational infrastructure consulting firm headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
UGI Corporation is a natural gas and electric power distribution company headquartered in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, with extensive operations in the United States and Europe.
ACM vs UGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $74.5M | $297.0M |
| Gross Margin | 7.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 22.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 14.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 3.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.0% | -20.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $1.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $74.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $297.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.4M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $-163.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.4M | $479.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.0M | $375.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $172.5M | $-273.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.3M | $-48.0M |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 26.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 24.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | -20.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 18.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | -22.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -3.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.90 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | $-0.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.08 | $2.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.25 | $1.74 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.27 | $-1.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.98 | $-0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $251.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | $6.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.18× | 1.19× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $251.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $335.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $426.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $240.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $213.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $183.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $6.3B |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $4.7B |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $15.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.8B | $15.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1B | $15.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | $15.1B |
| Q1 26 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.06× | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.99× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | 1.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.11× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 1.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $70.2M | $66.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.9M | $-155.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.1% | -7.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 10.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.94× | 0.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $616.0M | $282.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $70.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $66.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.1M | $90.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.7M | $289.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.7M | $684.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.1M | $164.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.8M | $151.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.3M | $390.0M |
| Q1 26 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-155.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.1M | $-168.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.7M | $67.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $538.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.9M | $-47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $274.5M | $-115.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.8M | $185.0M |
| Q1 26 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | -14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | -2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | -9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 15.2% |
| Q1 26 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | 1.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.90× | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.17× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
