vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alpha Cognition Inc. (ACOG) and Edible Garden AG Inc (EDBL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Edible Garden AG Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.5× Alpha Cognition Inc.). Edible Garden AG Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.8M vs $-7.1M).
Edible Garden AG Inc is a U.S.-based sustainable agricultural company specializing in hydroponically grown fresh organic herbs, leafy greens, and specialty vegetables. It distributes its pesticide-free produce to leading grocery retailers, food service operators, and direct-to-consumer platforms across North America, prioritizing eco-friendly, low-water farming practices.
ACOG vs EDBL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $4.1M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | -29.0% |
| Operating Margin | -283.7% | -138.6% |
| Net Margin | -245.5% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $-109.97 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.5M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.0M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -29.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 96.7% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 99.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | -283.7% | -138.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -187.0% | -126.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -346.1% | -114.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.9% | -107.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -70.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -57.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -27.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -123.3% |
| Q4 25 | -245.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -46.4% | -143.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -632.7% | -128.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -68.5% | -122.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -79.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -79.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -45.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -127.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $-109.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.30 | $1.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.65 | $-6.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | $-2.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-330.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-30.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-341.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $66.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $62.5M | $12.5M |
| Total Assets | $79.7M | $20.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $66.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $62.5M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.9M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.9M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.8M | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $511.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | $79.7M | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.3M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.1M | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.6M | $8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.9M | $-2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-7.1M | $-2.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -252.6% | -66.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.3% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-20.7M | $-12.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.3M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.1M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.0M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.1M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.4M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.1M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | -252.6% | -66.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -188.8% | -98.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -370.9% | -110.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -72.0% | -125.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -48.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -43.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -110.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -35.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.8% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACOG
Segment breakdown not available.
EDBL
| Herbs Produce Floral | $3.6M | 86% |
| Other | $576.0K | 14% |
