vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edible Garden AG Inc (EDBL) and LENDWAY, INC. (LDWY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LENDWAY, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.7M vs $4.1M, roughly 1.6× Edible Garden AG Inc). On growth, Edible Garden AG Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs -59.8%).
Edible Garden AG Inc is a U.S.-based sustainable agricultural company specializing in hydroponically grown fresh organic herbs, leafy greens, and specialty vegetables. It distributes its pesticide-free produce to leading grocery retailers, food service operators, and direct-to-consumer platforms across North America, prioritizing eco-friendly, low-water farming practices.
EDBL vs LDWY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $6.7M |
| Net Profit | — | $-2.3M |
| Gross Margin | -29.0% | 7.2% |
| Operating Margin | -138.6% | -34.0% |
| Net Margin | — | -33.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | -59.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -326.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-109.97 | $-1.29 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $8.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $449.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-534.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 31.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.7% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 21.7% |
| Q4 25 | -138.6% | -34.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -126.3% | -59.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -107.7% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -70.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.7% | -20.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.7% | -0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -123.3% | -20.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -33.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -143.6% | -55.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -122.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -79.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.8% | -17.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.3% | -3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -127.0% | -14.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-109.97 | $-1.29 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.38 | $-1.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.58 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.47 | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-330.78 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.32 | $-0.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.02 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-341.14 | $-0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7M | $40.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.5M | $7.1M |
| Total Assets | $20.6M | $105.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.13× | 5.68× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $40.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $37.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $34.6M |
| Q4 25 | $12.5M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $10.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0K | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | $14.5M |
| Q4 25 | $20.6M | $105.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $105.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $100.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $102.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $95.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | $106.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.13× | 5.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | 4.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | 3.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -66.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.4M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.6M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.8M | $-10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.4M | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $1.2M |
| Q4 25 | -66.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -98.9% | -193.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -110.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.5% | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -48.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.4% | -114.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -110.2% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.6% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EDBL
Segment breakdown not available.
LDWY
| Supermarket Customers | $5.7M | 85% |
| Wholesaler Customers | $1.0M | 15% |
