vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACME UNITED CORP (ACU) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ACME UNITED CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($52.3M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.3× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). ACME UNITED CORP runs the higher net margin — 1.9% vs -19.9%, a 21.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ACME UNITED CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs -20.7%). Over the past eight quarters, ACME UNITED CORP's revenue compounded faster (-2.9% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Acme United Corporation is a supplier of cutting, measuring and safety products for the school, home, office, hardware and industrial markets. The company was organized as a partnership in 1867 and incorporated in 1873 under the laws of the State of Connecticut. It is publicly traded on the NYSE American with symbol ACU.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
ACU vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $52.3M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $985.0K | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 39.7% | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -40.4% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.1M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.0M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.0M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.9M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.2M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.4M | $46.4M |
| Q1 26 | $985.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $-13.0M |
| Q1 26 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.0% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | 21.1% |
| Q1 26 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.8% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.1% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | -12.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | -28.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.46 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.16 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.43 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.09 | $-0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.2M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $33.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $116.7M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $195.2M | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.28× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6M | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4M | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $162.5M |
| Q1 26 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $116.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.6M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.8M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.7M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.3M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.0M | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.3M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.0M | $305.8M |
| Q1 26 | $195.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $171.0M | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $173.0M | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.9M | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $163.0M | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.2M | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.5M | $412.7M |
| Q1 26 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9M | $-1.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.0K | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $-2.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.2% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | -4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.34× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.33× | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.73× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.99× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.55× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACU
Segment breakdown not available.
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
