vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and WEST BANCORPORATION INC (WTBA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $26.9M, roughly 1.5× WEST BANCORPORATION INC). WEST BANCORPORATION INC runs the higher net margin — 39.2% vs -19.9%, a 59.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WEST BANCORPORATION INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.6% vs -20.7%). WEST BANCORPORATION INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($12.4M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, WEST BANCORPORATION INC's revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
West Bancorporation Inc. is a regional financial holding company headquartered in the U.S. Midwest, primarily serving markets across Iowa and Minnesota. It provides a full suite of personal and commercial banking services, including deposit accounts, mortgage loans, business lending, and wealth management solutions for individual consumers, small-to-medium enterprises, and local organizational clients.
MX vs WTBA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $10.6M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | 50.0% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | 39.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | 16.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | 34.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $0.61 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $26.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $24.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $23.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $20.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $19.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $5.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | 39.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | 43.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | 43.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | 32.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 33.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | 34.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | 26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $362.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $270.7M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $362.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $471.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | $232.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | $345.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | $243.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $270.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | $266.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $255.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $240.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $237.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $227.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $223.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $4.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $12.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | $12.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | 46.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | $79.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $9.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 46.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | 178.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | 53.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | 35.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 65.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 125.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 37.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.26× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | 1.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
WTBA
Segment breakdown not available.
