vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Adient plc (ADNT) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Adient plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.6B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.7× Roper Technologies). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs -0.6%, a 16.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 4.3%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $15.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs -1.4%).
Adient plc is an American, Irish-domiciled company that operates as the largest manufacturer of automotive seating for customers worldwide and is based in Plymouth, Michigan, United States.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
ADNT vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.6B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $-22.0M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | 6.0% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | -0.6% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.3% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-22.0M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.0M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-335.0M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.0M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.3% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.3% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.28 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.17 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.43 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.99 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.88 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $8.8B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.37× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.8B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.1B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.28× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $80.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.0M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $174.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $80.0M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.0M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.0M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.0M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.0M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.0M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $158.0M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-90.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.83× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.78× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.33× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
