vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ameren (AEE) and Digital Realty (DLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ameren is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.1× Digital Realty). Ameren runs the higher net margin — 14.2% vs 6.0%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Digital Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.1% vs -8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Digital Realty's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs -0.9%).
Ameren Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a public utility holding company in the United States. It operates through four segments: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission. The company engages in the rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution activities; and rate-regulated natural gas distribution and transmission businesses. It primarily generates electricity through coal, nucle...
Digital Realty is a real estate investment trust that owns, operates and invests in carrier-neutral data centers across the world. The company offers data center, colocation, and interconnection services.
AEE vs DLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $253.0M | $98.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | 14.2% | 6.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | 16.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | -10.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.92 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $253.0M | $98.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $641.0M | $67.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.0M | $110.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.0M | $189.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $457.0M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.0M | $80.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 69.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.92 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.35 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $2.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.07 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.70 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.97 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.0M | $3.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $19.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4B | $22.9B |
| Total Assets | $48.5B | $49.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.45× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0M | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $22.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $23.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $22.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.2B | $21.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1B | $21.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | $21.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $20.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $49.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $48.5B | $49.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.4B | $48.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.6B | $48.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7B | $45.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.6B | $45.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.3B | $45.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3B | $43.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $956.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-54.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 56.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.78× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-775.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $956.0M | $719.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $652.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $862.0M | $641.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $399.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $817.0M | $769.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $897.0M | $566.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $557.0M | $573.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-54.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-204.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-633.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-473.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-240.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-445.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 56.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.78× | 7.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 9.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.11× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.49× | 3.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.93× | 4.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.96× | 11.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 7.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
