vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ameren (AEE) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ameren is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.6× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 14.2%, a 0.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs -8.2%). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL produced more free cash flow last quarter ($87.2M vs $-54.0M). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -0.9%).
Ameren Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a public utility holding company in the United States. It operates through four segments: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission. The company engages in the rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution activities; and rate-regulated natural gas distribution and transmission businesses. It primarily generates electricity through coal, nucle...
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
AEE vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $253.0M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 14.2% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.92 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $253.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $641.0M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.0M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.0M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.0M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $457.0M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.0M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $262.0M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.4% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.92 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.35 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.07 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.70 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.97 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.0M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $19.4B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $48.5B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.45× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.0M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.0M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | $19.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.8B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $48.5B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.4B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.6B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.6B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.3B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.3B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.45× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $956.0M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-54.0M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.0% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 56.7% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.78× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-775.0M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $956.0M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $862.0M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $817.0M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $897.0M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $557.0M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $492.0M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-54.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.0M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-204.0M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-633.0M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-473.0M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-240.0M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-445.0M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-398.0M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.9% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 56.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.3% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.0% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 3.78× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.11× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.49× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.93× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.96× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.88× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AEE
Segment breakdown not available.
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
