vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $751.2M, roughly 1.5× Monolithic Power Systems). Monolithic Power Systems runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs 14.3%, a 8.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monolithic Power Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.8% vs 1.7%). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL produced more free cash flow last quarter ($87.2M vs $63.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Monolithic Power Systems's revenue compounded faster (28.1% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
MPWR vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.2M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $171.7M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 26.6% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 22.9% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.8% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -86.3% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.50 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $751.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $737.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $664.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $637.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $621.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $620.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $457.9M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $171.7M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.8M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.0M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.1M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.4M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.5M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 55.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.4% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.4% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.4% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.3% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.1% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 26.6% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.0% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 201.8% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.2% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $3.50 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.74 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.81 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.81 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.71 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.95 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.05 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.89 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $4.2B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $862.9M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $104.9M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.9M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.5% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.61× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $666.2M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.3M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.6M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.4M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.7M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.7M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.0M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.1M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $63.9M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.8M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.5M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.0M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.9M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.9M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.5M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.1M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.7% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.9% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.7% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.76× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.40× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.68× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MPWR
Segment breakdown not available.
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
