vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST INC (AHT) and Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp (MGY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($358.5M vs $259.0M, roughly 1.4× ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST INC). Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp runs the higher net margin — 28.1% vs -26.8%, a 54.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.3% vs -6.0%). Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($145.6M vs $-86.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp's revenue compounded faster (3.2% CAGR vs -7.7%).
Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust focused on upper-upscale full-service hotel properties across key U.S. urban, suburban and resort markets. Its portfolio holds assets under top global hospitality brands, serving business and leisure travelers, with a focus on long-term value growth and stable shareholder returns.
Imperial Oil Limited is a Canadian petroleum company. It is Canada's second-largest integrated oil company that is also occasionally known as Imperial Esso. It is majority-owned by American oil company ExxonMobil, with a 69.6% ownership stake in the company. It is a producer of crude oil, diluted bitumen, and natural gas. Imperial Oil is one of Canada's major petroleum refiners and petrochemical producers. It supplies Esso-brand service stations.
AHT vs MGY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $259.0M | $358.5M |
| Net Profit | $-69.3M | $100.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -2.6% | 35.6% |
| Net Margin | -26.8% | 28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -6.0% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.2% | -3.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-12.85 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $358.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $259.0M | $317.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.1M | $324.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $302.0M | $319.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.4M | $350.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.5M | $326.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.6M | $333.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $316.5M | $336.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $100.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-69.3M | $68.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-60.1M | $75.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.4M | $78.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.0M | $102.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-124.2M | $85.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-57.9M | $99.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.3M | $95.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.6% | 29.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.3% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | 38.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | 38.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 38.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.8% | 39.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -26.8% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.6% | 23.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.1% | 24.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.2% | 29.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.1% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.9% | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.54 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.85 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.35 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.88 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.91 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.64 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.39 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.50 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $66.1M | $124.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-626.4M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $124.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.1M | $266.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.9M | $280.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $251.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.8M | $247.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.9M | $260.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.7M | $276.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $121.8M | $275.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $393.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $393.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $392.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $392.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $392.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $394.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $394.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-626.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-548.7M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-485.5M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-446.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-419.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-288.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-225.9M | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-15.7M | $197.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-86.8M | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -33.5% | 40.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 27.5% | 35.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-135.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $197.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-15.7M | $208.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $247.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.3M | $198.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-25.0M | $224.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.6M | $222.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $795.0K | $217.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | $269.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-86.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-226.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-44.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-131.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 40.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -33.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -47.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 35.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.96× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.16× | 2.82× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AHT
| Occupancy | $190.2M | 73% |
| Food And Beverage | $51.8M | 20% |
| Hotel Other | $16.6M | 6% |
MGY
| Natural gas (Mcf/d) | $193.1M | 54% |
| Natural gas revenues | $51.8M | 14% |
| Natural gas liquids revenues | $49.4M | 14% |
| Oil (Bbls/d) | $40.7M | 11% |
| Natural gas (MMcf) | $17.4M | 5% |
| Oil (MBbls) | $3.7M | 1% |
| Natural gas liquids (MBbls) | $2.7M | 1% |