vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP (CATY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $222.8M, roughly 1.4× CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP). CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 653.4% vs 4.3%, a 649.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs 12.0%). CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($363.7M vs $51.4M). Over the past eight quarters, CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP's revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Cathay General Bancorp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company that operates Cathay Bank, offering full-spectrum commercial and personal banking services. It primarily serves Asian American communities and small-to-medium enterprises across major U.S. states including California, New York and Texas, as well as select Asian markets, with products covering deposits, loans, and wealth management solutions.
AIN vs CATY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $222.8M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $90.5M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 50.9% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 653.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 19.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 12.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $1.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $222.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $210.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $196.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $187.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $186.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $189.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $178.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $175.2M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $90.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $77.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $69.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $80.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $66.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $71.4M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 50.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 49.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 46.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 46.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 41.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 45.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 653.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 37.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 587.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 35.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 37.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 40.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $1.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $1.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $1.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $0.98 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $119.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $24.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $119.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $119.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $119.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $119.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $119.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | $119.1M |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $24.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $24.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $23.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $23.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $23.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $23.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $23.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $23.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | 0.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $368.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $363.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 163.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 4.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $672.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $368.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $150.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $64.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $99.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $329.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $81.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $88.2M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $363.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $150.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $96.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $325.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $87.3M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 163.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 71.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 51.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 174.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 40.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | 49.8% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 4.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 1.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 1.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 1.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
CATY
Segment breakdown not available.
