vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC (CBSH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($475.7M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.5× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 4.3%, a 25.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 11.1%). Over the past eight quarters, COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. is a regional bank holding company headquartered in Missouri, with principal offices in Kansas City and St. Louis. It is the corporate parent of Commerce Bank, which offers a diversified line of financial services, including business and personal banking, wealth management and investments through its affiliated companies.
AIN vs CBSH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $475.7M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $141.6M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 29.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 0.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $475.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $449.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $441.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $445.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $428.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $422.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $421.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $414.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $141.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $140.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $141.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $152.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $131.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $136.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $139.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 40.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 39.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 41.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 42.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 43.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 32.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 30.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 32.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 33.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.96 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.86 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $1.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $1.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $35.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $32.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $32.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $32.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $32.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $32.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $31.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $30.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $645.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $129.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $111.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $138.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $577.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $431.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $147.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $592.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $113.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $100.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $126.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $531.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $138.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 131.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 29.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 126.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 99.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 33.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 4.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 4.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 3.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 1.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
CBSH
Segment breakdown not available.
