vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Federal Realty Investment Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.0M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.0× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs 4.3%, a 34.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 8.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Federal Realty Investment Trust's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.
AIN vs FRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $336.0M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $129.7M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 53.8% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 38.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 103.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $1.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $336.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $322.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $311.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $309.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $311.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $303.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $296.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $129.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $155.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $63.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $65.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $61.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $112.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 53.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 53.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 50.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 37.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.49 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $1.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.74 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $1.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $107.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $5.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $9.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 1.53× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $107.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $107.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $111.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $177.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $109.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $123.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $97.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $103.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $8.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $8.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $8.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $622.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $147.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $150.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $179.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $574.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $144.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $169.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 2.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 8.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 2.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 1.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
FRT
Segment breakdown not available.
