vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $138.9M, roughly 2.3× Limbach Holdings, Inc.). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs 3.2%, a 1.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 4.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Limbach Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Limbach Flugmotoren is a Chinese-owned company based in Germany that produces aircraft engines.
AIN vs LMB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $138.9M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $4.4M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 22.4% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 0.8% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 3.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $138.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $186.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $184.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $142.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $133.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $143.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $133.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $122.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $6.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 27.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 6.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 4.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.64 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.62 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $15.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $56.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $196.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $377.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 0.29× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $11.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $38.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $38.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $44.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $59.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $56.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $56.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $28.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $23.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $20.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $19.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $196.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $195.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $181.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $170.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $161.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $153.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $142.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $133.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $377.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $381.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $409.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $343.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $336.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $352.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $324.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $303.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 0.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $28.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $16.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $27.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $11.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $18.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $13.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 10.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 0.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 2.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
LMB
| ODR | $99.8M | 72% |
| GCR | $39.0M | 28% |
