vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC (TCBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($324.0M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.0× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs 4.3%, a 18.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.5% vs 12.0%). Over the past eight quarters, TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Texas Capital Bank is a bank headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The bank has branches located in every major city in Texas. Its parent bank holding company is Texas Capital Bancshares. It also operates an online-only banking division, Bask Bank.
AIN vs TCBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $324.0M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $73.8M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 15.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 56.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $1.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $324.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $327.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $340.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $307.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $280.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $229.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $125.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $267.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $100.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $105.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $77.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $47.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $-61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $41.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 40.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | -63.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 21.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | -48.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $2.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $2.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $1.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $1.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $-1.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $878.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $33.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $878.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $620.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $620.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $620.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $660.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $660.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $660.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $660.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $33.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $31.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $32.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $31.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $30.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $29.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 0.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $360.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $63.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $368.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $480.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $332.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $347.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $415.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $317.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $11.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 106.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 47.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 180.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 253.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 28.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 3.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 6.76× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 0.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
TCBI
Segment breakdown not available.
