vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and UDR, Inc. (UDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UDR, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.8M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.3× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). UDR, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 44.6% vs 4.3%, a 40.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 0.9%). Over the past eight quarters, UDR, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.3% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
UDR, Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust specializing in owning, operating, and redeveloping high-quality multifamily residential apartment communities. It operates across major U.S. metropolitan markets, catering to a diverse tenant base including young professionals, families, and middle-to-high income households.
AIN vs UDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $425.8M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $189.8M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 54.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 44.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 0.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 147.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $425.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $433.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $431.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $425.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $421.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $422.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $420.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $415.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $189.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $222.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $40.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $37.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $76.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $28.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 54.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 64.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 16.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 44.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 51.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | -220.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 7.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.63 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $1.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $10.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $2.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $5.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $3.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $10.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $11.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 1.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 1.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 1.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 1.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 1.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 1.55× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $902.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $234.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $156.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $876.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $230.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $238.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $164.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $190.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $103.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $627.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $171.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 150.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 148.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 41.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 58.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 12.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 59.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 16.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 4.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 6.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 2.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 10.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 8.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
UDR
| Rental income | $423.3M | 99% |
| Joint venture management and other fees | $2.5M | 1% |
