vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Bristow Group Inc. (VTOL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bristow Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($377.3M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.2× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). Bristow Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs 4.3%, a 0.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 6.7%). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.4M vs $47.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Bristow Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.8% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Bristow Helicopters Limited is a British civil helicopter operator originally based at Aberdeen Airport, Scotland, which is currently a part of the U.S.-based Bristow Group which in turn has its corporate headquarters in Houston, Texas, U.S. In 2020, Bristow Group was merged with Era Helicopters, a large U.S.-based commercial helicopter operator that was previously a division of Era Aviation, with the two companies then continuing to use the Bristow name.
AIN vs VTOL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $377.3M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $18.4M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.61 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $377.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $386.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $376.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $350.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $353.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $365.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $359.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $337.1M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $31.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $27.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $28.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $6.6M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.61 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $1.72 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.96 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $286.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $671.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $286.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $245.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $251.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $191.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $247.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $200.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $178.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $140.6M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $671.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $675.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $705.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $701.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $689.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $629.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $594.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | $544.1M |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $984.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $931.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $891.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $899.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $849.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $820.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | 0.66× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $76.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $47.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 12.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 7.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 4.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $56.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $76.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $23.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-603.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $51.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $33.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $47.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $67.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $-52.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $-37.9M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | -15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 19.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 4.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | -0.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 4.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
VTOL
| Offshore Energy Services | $247.5M | 66% |
| Government Services | $100.1M | 27% |
| Other | $21.9M | 6% |
| Related Party | $7.8M | 2% |
