vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Xiao-I Corp (AIXI) and Amphenol (APH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.4B vs $11.5M, roughly 559.1× Xiao-I Corp). Amphenol runs the higher net margin — 18.6% vs -263.9%, a 282.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Xiao-i is a Chinese cognitive artificial intelligence enterprise founded in 2001.
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
AIXI vs APH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.5M | $6.4B |
| Net Profit | $-30.4M | $1.2B |
| Gross Margin | 58.1% | 38.2% |
| Operating Margin | -254.9% | 26.8% |
| Net Margin | -263.9% | 18.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 49.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 60.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.93 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.5M | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5M | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.0M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-30.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $737.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $746.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $604.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.5M | $524.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $548.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.1% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.1% | 36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.5% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -254.9% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -254.9% | 25.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.0% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -263.9% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -263.9% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.2% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.93 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.97 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.64 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.87 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.0M | $11.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $14.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $13.4B |
| Total Assets | $82.4M | $36.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.09× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $11.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0M | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $36.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.4M | $27.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.4M | $25.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.6M | $18.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.41× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.3M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.5B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 22.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $4.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $764.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $847.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $704.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $664.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $599.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $576.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $647.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $474.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $522.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $505.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 15.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIXI
Segment breakdown not available.
APH
| Communications Solutions Segment | $3.5B | 54% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions Segment | $1.7B | 26% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $1.4B | 21% |
