vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Digital Realty (DLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Digital Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.1× Albemarle Corporation). Digital Realty runs the higher net margin — 6.0% vs -29.0%, a 35.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Digital Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.1% vs 15.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Digital Realty's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Digital Realty is a real estate investment trust that owns, operates and invests in carrier-neutral data centers across the world. The company offers data center, colocation, and interconnection services.
ALB vs DLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $98.6M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 6.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 16.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | -10.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $98.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $67.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $110.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $189.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $80.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 69.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $2.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $3.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $22.9B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $49.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $22.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $23.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $22.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $21.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $21.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $21.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $20.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $49.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $49.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $48.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $48.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $45.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $45.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $45.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $43.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $719.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $652.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $641.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $399.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $769.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $566.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $573.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 3.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 4.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
DLR
Segment breakdown not available.
