vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.5× Albemarle Corporation). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs -29.0%, a 44.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 11.3%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $233.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
ALB vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 842.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
