vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs -29.0%, a 43.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 1.7%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
ALB vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
