vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (ALH) and Li Bang International Corp Inc. (LBGJ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($437.6M vs $4.7M, roughly 92.8× Li Bang International Corp Inc.). Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs -23.9%, a 31.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Alliance Laundry Systems LLC is an American provider of commercial laundry systems. The company designs, manufactures, and markets a line of commercial and industrial laundry equipment under various brands in over 100 countries. Among the company's products are washers, drying tumblers and ironers for the coin laundry, multi-housing laundries, institutional laundries and laundries for consumer residences. Alliance Laundry Systems manufactures products under the brands Speed Queen, Primus, Hue...
Li & Fung Limited is a Hong Kong–based supply chain management company. Established in 1906, the company became publicly traded in 1973 and has since played a significant role in manufacturing apparel, toys, and various consumer goods for major North American and European retailers. Significant growth occurred after its public listing, reaching a peak market capitalization in 2011, but the rise of platforms like Alibaba and Amazon, which directly connect manufacturers with consumers, created ...
ALH vs LBGJ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q4 2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $437.6M | $4.7M |
| Net Profit | $32.9M | $-1.1M |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 17.8% |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | -25.1% |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | -23.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 620.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $437.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $384.3M | — |
| Q3 25 | $32.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.3M | — |
| Q3 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -25.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.6% | — |
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $136.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $10.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-136.4M | $7.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $28.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $136.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $-136.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-284.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $116.8M | $258.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $87.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $258.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 3.55× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALH
| Equipment Product Or Service | $275.7M | 63% |
| Other | $106.8M | 24% |
| Service Parts | $33.1M | 8% |
| Equipment Financing | $12.6M | 3% |
LBGJ
Segment breakdown not available.
