vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Li Bang International Corp Inc. (LBGJ) and 3M (MMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
3M is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $4.7M, roughly 1278.4× Li Bang International Corp Inc.). 3M runs the higher net margin — 10.8% vs -23.9%, a 34.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Li & Fung Limited is a Hong Kong–based supply chain management company. Established in 1906, the company became publicly traded in 1973 and has since played a significant role in manufacturing apparel, toys, and various consumer goods for major North American and European retailers. Significant growth occurred after its public listing, reaching a peak market capitalization in 2011, but the rise of platforms like Alibaba and Amazon, which directly connect manufacturers with consumers, created ...
The 3M Company is an American multinational conglomerate operating in the fields of industry, worker safety, and consumer goods. Based in the Saint Paul suburb of Maplewood, the company produces over 60,000 products, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection film, electrical, electronic connecting, insulating materials, car-care products, electronic circuits, and optical films. Among its best-known consume...
LBGJ vs MMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2024 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.7M | $6.0B |
| Net Profit | $-1.1M | $653.0M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 40.7% |
| Operating Margin | -25.1% | 23.2% |
| Net Margin | -23.9% | 10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 1.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -41.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $653.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $577.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $834.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $723.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $728.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | 51.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 42.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.9% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.23 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | $1.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $3.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.2M | $10.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.8M | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $28.8M | $35.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.31× | 3.29× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8M | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $37.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $37.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $38.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.8M | $39.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $40.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $43.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | 3.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $258.4K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 33.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $3.7B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-954.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-79.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.4K | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-315.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $752.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -32.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LBGJ
Segment breakdown not available.
MMM
| Safety and Industrial business segment | $2.9B | 49% |
| Transportation and Electronics business segment | $1.8B | 31% |
| Consumer business segment | $1.1B | 19% |
| Corporate | $121.0M | 2% |
