vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Allot Ltd. (ALLT) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $24.1M, roughly 1.7× Allot Ltd.). Allot Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -7.0% vs -19.9%, a 12.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Allot Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.5% vs -20.7%). Allot Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.0M vs $-4.8M).
Allot Ltd., formerly Allot Communications, is an Israeli high-tech company that develops telecommunications software. The company is headquartered in Hod Hasharon, Israel.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
ALLT vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.1M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $-1.7M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 72.1% | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | -1.7% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | -7.0% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.5% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 49.6% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.1M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.1M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-332.0K | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 72.1% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.3% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 68.5% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.1% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.2% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.1% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $60.1M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $99.7M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $154.1M | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.1M | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9M | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.7M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.7M | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.1M | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.3M | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.5M | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $426.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.4M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.0M | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.5% | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-6.0M | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.0K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALLT
Segment breakdown not available.
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
