vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Allot Ltd. (ALLT) and Namib Minerals (NAMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Namib Minerals is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $24.1M, roughly 1.7× Allot Ltd.). Namib Minerals produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.4M vs $4.0M).

Allot Ltd., formerly Allot Communications, is an Israeli high-tech company that develops telecommunications software. The company is headquartered in Hod Hasharon, Israel.

Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.

ALLT vs NAMM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
NAMM
NAMM
1.7× larger
NAMM
$41.9M
$24.1M
ALLT
More free cash flow
NAMM
NAMM
$3.4M more FCF
NAMM
$7.4M
$4.0M
ALLT

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025

Metric
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Revenue
$24.1M
$41.9M
Net Profit
$-1.7M
Gross Margin
72.1%
45.7%
Operating Margin
-1.7%
29.8%
Net Margin
-7.0%
Revenue YoY
8.5%
Net Profit YoY
49.6%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.04

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Q2 25
$24.1M
$41.9M
Q1 25
$23.1M
Q2 24
$22.2M
Q2 23
$25.0M
Q2 22
$32.8M
Net Profit
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Q2 25
$-1.7M
Q1 25
$-332.0K
Q2 24
$-3.4M
Q2 23
$-20.7M
Q2 22
$-6.2M
Gross Margin
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Q2 25
72.1%
45.7%
Q1 25
69.3%
Q2 24
68.5%
Q2 23
69.2%
Q2 22
68.7%
Operating Margin
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Q2 25
-1.7%
29.8%
Q1 25
-3.1%
Q2 24
-15.2%
Q2 23
-85.8%
Q2 22
-19.8%
Net Margin
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Q2 25
-7.0%
Q1 25
-1.4%
Q2 24
-15.1%
Q2 23
-82.8%
Q2 22
-19.0%
EPS (diluted)
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Q2 25
$-0.04
Q1 25
$-0.01
Q2 24
$-0.09
Q2 23
$-0.55
Q2 22
$-0.17

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$60.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$99.7M
Total Assets
$154.1M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Q2 25
$60.1M
Q1 25
$10.1M
Q2 24
$15.9M
Q2 23
$15.5M
Q2 22
$15.5M
Stockholders' Equity
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Q2 25
$99.7M
Q1 25
$50.0M
Q2 24
$46.7M
Q2 23
$76.1M
Q2 22
$114.4M
Total Assets
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Q2 25
$154.1M
Q1 25
$140.3M
Q2 24
$132.5M
Q2 23
$177.8M
Q2 22
$229.3M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$4.4M
$11.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$4.0M
$7.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
16.5%
17.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.7%
9.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-6.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Q2 25
$4.4M
$11.4M
Q1 25
$1.7M
Q2 24
$1.2M
Q2 23
$-11.3M
Q2 22
$-7.8M
Free Cash Flow
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Q2 25
$4.0M
$7.4M
Q1 25
$1.4M
Q2 24
$217.0K
Q2 23
$-11.6M
Q2 22
$-9.1M
FCF Margin
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Q2 25
16.5%
17.6%
Q1 25
6.1%
Q2 24
1.0%
Q2 23
-46.4%
Q2 22
-27.7%
Capex Intensity
ALLT
ALLT
NAMM
NAMM
Q2 25
1.7%
9.6%
Q1 25
1.2%
Q2 24
4.3%
Q2 23
1.2%
Q2 22
3.9%

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons