vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) and SOCIETY PASS INCORPORATED. (SOPA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOCIETY PASS INCORPORATED. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4M vs $1.3M, roughly 1.1× Aeluma, Inc.). Aeluma, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -145.7% vs -370.8%, a 225.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOCIETY PASS INCORPORATED. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-17.6% vs -21.1%). Aeluma, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-282.0K vs $-16.7M).
Aeluma, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered technology firm focused on the design, development, and production of high-performance optoelectronic components and semiconductor products. Its core offerings include photonic sensors and laser diodes, serving the LiDAR, 5G/6G communication, industrial sensing, and automotive markets across North America and the Asia-Pacific region.
The Wilderness Society is an Australian, community-based, not-for-profit non-governmental environmental advocacy organisation.
ALMU vs SOPA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3M | $1.4M |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | $-5.1M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 64.3% |
| Operating Margin | -163.6% | -379.9% |
| Net Margin | -145.7% | -370.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.1% | -17.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.0% | -271.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.89 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $479.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.8M |
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.4% | 64.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.7% |
| Q4 25 | -163.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -116.1% | -379.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -126.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -165.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -70.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -126.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -156.6% |
| Q4 25 | -145.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -107.8% | -370.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -124.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -217.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -82.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -113.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -153.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.6M | $6.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $40.8M | $13.9M |
| Total Assets | $42.6M | $32.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $38.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $833.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6M |
| Q4 25 | $40.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.9M | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-663.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $862.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | $32.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-251.0K | $-16.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-282.0K | $-16.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -22.2% | -1211.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-251.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-815.0K | $-16.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-864.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-282.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.0% | -1211.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
