vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Vital Farms, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($213.6M vs $108.5M, roughly 2.0× AMBARELLA INC). Vital Farms, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs -13.9%, a 21.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 28.7%). AMBARELLA INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.4M vs $-32.1M). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs 20.2%).

Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...

Vital Tomosi Dairy Limited is a dairy processing company in Uganda. The company is a joint venture between Vital Capital Fund, "an impact investing fund primarily focused on Sub-Saharan Africa", and "Tomosi Dairy Farms, a Ugandan producer of dairy products".

AMBA vs VITL — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
VITL
VITL
2.0× larger
VITL
$213.6M
$108.5M
AMBA
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
AMBA
AMBA
+2.6% gap
AMBA
31.2%
28.7%
VITL
Higher net margin
VITL
VITL
21.6% more per $
VITL
7.6%
-13.9%
AMBA
More free cash flow
AMBA
AMBA
$63.6M more FCF
AMBA
$31.4M
$-32.1M
VITL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
AMBA
AMBA
Annualised
AMBA
45.0%
20.2%
VITL

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Revenue
$108.5M
$213.6M
Net Profit
$-15.1M
$16.3M
Gross Margin
59.6%
35.8%
Operating Margin
-15.0%
10.0%
Net Margin
-13.9%
7.6%
Revenue YoY
31.2%
28.7%
Net Profit YoY
37.2%
54.3%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.35
$0.35

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$108.5M
$213.6M
Q3 25
$95.5M
$198.9M
Q2 25
$85.9M
$184.8M
Q1 25
$84.0M
$162.2M
Q4 24
$82.7M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$63.7M
$145.0M
Q2 24
$54.5M
$147.4M
Q1 24
$51.6M
$147.9M
Net Profit
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$-15.1M
$16.3M
Q3 25
$-20.0M
$16.4M
Q2 25
$-24.3M
$16.6M
Q1 25
$-20.2M
$16.9M
Q4 24
$-24.1M
$10.6M
Q3 24
$-34.9M
$7.4M
Q2 24
$-37.9M
$16.3M
Q1 24
$-60.6M
$19.0M
Gross Margin
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
59.6%
35.8%
Q3 25
58.9%
37.7%
Q2 25
60.0%
38.9%
Q1 25
60.0%
38.5%
Q4 24
60.6%
36.1%
Q3 24
60.8%
36.9%
Q2 24
60.9%
39.1%
Q1 24
59.8%
39.8%
Operating Margin
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
-15.0%
10.0%
Q3 25
-23.0%
10.8%
Q2 25
-30.1%
12.9%
Q1 25
-30.2%
13.4%
Q4 24
-30.9%
7.8%
Q3 24
-56.9%
6.4%
Q2 24
-72.4%
11.6%
Q1 24
-80.8%
16.3%
Net Margin
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
-13.9%
7.6%
Q3 25
-20.9%
8.3%
Q2 25
-28.3%
9.0%
Q1 25
-24.1%
10.4%
Q4 24
-29.1%
6.4%
Q3 24
-54.8%
5.1%
Q2 24
-69.6%
11.1%
Q1 24
-117.4%
12.9%
EPS (diluted)
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$-0.35
$0.35
Q3 25
$-0.47
$0.36
Q2 25
$-0.58
$0.36
Q1 25
$-0.48
$0.37
Q4 24
$-0.58
$0.23
Q3 24
$-0.85
$0.16
Q2 24
$-0.93
$0.36
Q1 24
$-1.51
$0.43

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$174.1M
$48.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$590.1M
$351.3M
Total Assets
$751.9M
$518.7M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$174.1M
$48.8M
Q3 25
$142.7M
$93.8M
Q2 25
$141.3M
$108.2M
Q1 25
$144.6M
$156.3M
Q4 24
$127.1M
$150.6M
Q3 24
$153.9M
$149.5M
Q2 24
$131.8M
$133.2M
Q1 24
$144.9M
$113.8M
Stockholders' Equity
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$590.1M
$351.3M
Q3 25
$576.5M
$331.2M
Q2 25
$572.7M
$309.8M
Q1 25
$561.4M
$288.9M
Q4 24
$554.3M
$269.3M
Q3 24
$547.6M
$253.4M
Q2 24
$555.4M
$238.4M
Q1 24
$559.9M
$213.3M
Total Assets
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$751.9M
$518.7M
Q3 25
$706.4M
$481.5M
Q2 25
$701.9M
$430.8M
Q1 25
$689.0M
$376.9M
Q4 24
$670.8M
$359.3M
Q3 24
$650.3M
$344.7M
Q2 24
$638.7M
$320.5M
Q1 24
$657.7M
$300.2M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$34.3M
$5.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$31.4M
$-32.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
29.0%
-15.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.7%
17.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.35×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$64.3M
$-48.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$34.3M
$5.8M
Q3 25
$5.5M
$23.4M
Q2 25
$14.8M
$-761.0K
Q1 25
$25.4M
$5.3M
Q4 24
$6.6M
$14.8M
Q3 24
$16.7M
$10.0M
Q2 24
$-15.0M
$16.1M
Q1 24
$-4.0M
$23.9M
Free Cash Flow
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
$31.4M
$-32.1M
Q3 25
$1.4M
$-10.6M
Q2 25
$10.2M
$-7.6M
Q1 25
$21.2M
$2.1M
Q4 24
$4.1M
$-3.4M
Q3 24
$14.2M
$6.4M
Q2 24
$-16.1M
$10.5M
Q1 24
$-6.0M
$22.6M
FCF Margin
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
29.0%
-15.1%
Q3 25
1.4%
-5.3%
Q2 25
11.9%
-4.1%
Q1 25
25.3%
1.3%
Q4 24
5.0%
-2.0%
Q3 24
22.2%
4.4%
Q2 24
-29.5%
7.2%
Q1 24
-11.6%
15.3%
Capex Intensity
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
2.7%
17.8%
Q3 25
4.3%
17.1%
Q2 25
5.3%
3.7%
Q1 25
5.0%
1.9%
Q4 24
3.0%
10.9%
Q3 24
4.0%
2.5%
Q2 24
2.1%
3.8%
Q1 24
3.7%
0.9%
Cash Conversion
AMBA
AMBA
VITL
VITL
Q4 25
0.35×
Q3 25
1.43×
Q2 25
-0.05×
Q1 25
0.31×
Q4 24
1.40×
Q3 24
1.34×
Q2 24
0.99×
Q1 24
1.26×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

AMBA
AMBA

TW$76.0M70%
Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan$20.2M19%
North America Other Than United States$7.4M7%
Other$5.0M5%

VITL
VITL

Eggs And Egg Related Products$205.8M96%
Butter And Butter Related Products$7.7M4%

Related Comparisons