vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and ClearSign Technologies Corp (CLIR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ClearSign Technologies Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.7M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.3× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs -8.5%, a 72.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ClearSign Technologies Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (522.2% vs 15.3%).
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
ClearSign Technologies Corporation (ClearSign) is a United States-based company that develops emission-control technology.
AMBO vs CLIR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $3.7M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-311.0K |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 21.9% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -22.5% |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | -8.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | 522.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | 73.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $133.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $401.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $590.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $45.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-311.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | 41.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | 93.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 39.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -22.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -170.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -1382.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -562.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -282.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -77.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -4748.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -113.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -138.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | -1263.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -517.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -197.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -62.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | -4160.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -100.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $9.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | $9.5M |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | $12.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-511.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-415.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -278.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
