vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and CaliberCos Inc. (CWD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CaliberCos Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.5× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs -188.3%, a 252.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ambow Education Holding Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.3% vs -52.5%).
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
CaliberCos Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered alternative asset management firm focused primarily on real estate investments. It offers a diverse suite of investment vehicles covering commercial, residential, and industrial real estate assets, serving institutional investors, high-net-worth individuals, and retail clients across North America. It also delivers asset management, property operation, and value-add real estate development services to support consistent long-term returns for investors.
AMBO vs CWD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $4.1M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-7.7M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -196.6% |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | -188.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | -52.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | 32.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $1.95 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-11.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $146.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -196.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -129.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -112.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -62.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -236.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -65.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -22.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -188.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -120.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | -104.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -60.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -247.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | -57.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.95 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-4.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $-4.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $2.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | $1.3M |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | $135.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $683.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | $-19.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-745.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $135.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $82.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $59.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $105.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $158.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | $195.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $201.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-12.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $555.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-74.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
