vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($517.5M vs $455.0M, roughly 1.1× American Homes 4 Rent). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs 6.1%, a 25.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs 4.2%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $145.6M). Over the past eight quarters, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC's revenue compounded faster (14.5% CAGR vs 3.6%).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.
AMH vs WWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $517.5M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | $31.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | 162.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $517.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | $470.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | $474.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | $412.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | $494.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | $440.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | $425.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | $13.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $621.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $408.0M |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $621.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $676.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $708.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $710.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $648.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $702.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $814.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $408.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $376.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $344.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $312.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $295.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $262.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | 2.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | 2.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | 3.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | $146.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | 28.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | 4.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $125.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | $-83.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $26.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | $-91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | $23.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.60× | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | -6.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | 4.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMH
Segment breakdown not available.
WWW
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $230.2M | 44% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $142.6M | 28% |
| Work Group | $134.0M | 26% |
| Other | $10.7M | 2% |
