vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC (AMN) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($748.2M vs $517.5M, roughly 1.4× WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs -1.0%, a 7.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs 1.8%). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($145.6M vs $67.6M). Over the past eight quarters, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC's revenue compounded faster (14.5% CAGR vs -4.5%).
AMN Healthcare Services Inc. is a leading US healthcare sector workforce solutions and staffing provider. It offers temporary and permanent placement for nurses, physicians, allied health and other clinical/non-clinical staff, plus workforce management tools and consulting for hospitals, clinics and other medical facilities.
Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.
AMN vs WWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $748.2M | $517.5M |
| Net Profit | $-7.7M | $31.8M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | -1.0% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.8% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 95.9% | 162.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $517.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $748.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.5M | $470.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.2M | $474.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.5M | $412.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $734.7M | $494.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $687.5M | $440.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.7M | $425.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.3M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-116.2M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-187.5M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $13.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.7% | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.8% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.76 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.02 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.90 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.18 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $767.1M | $621.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $642.1M | $408.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.19× | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $621.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $767.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $676.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $708.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $710.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $648.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $702.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $814.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $408.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $642.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.4M | $376.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $607.6M | $344.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $715.1M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $706.6M | $312.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $890.7M | $295.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $876.9M | $262.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.6M | $146.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.6M | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.0% | 28.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $233.8M | $125.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.7M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.5M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.7M | $-83.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.8M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.7M | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.5M | $26.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $67.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.7M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.7M | $-91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.6M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.4M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.2M | $23.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.60× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.54× | 4.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.13× | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMN
| Travel Nurse Staffing | $208.3M | 28% |
| Allied Staffing | $146.9M | 20% |
| Labor Disruption Services | $124.3M | 17% |
| Technology And Workforce Solutions | $88.0M | 12% |
| Language Services | $69.9M | 9% |
| Other | $29.6M | 4% |
| International Nurse Staffing | $29.6M | 4% |
| Interim Leadership Staffing | $24.1M | 3% |
| Vendor Management Systems | $16.3M | 2% |
| Local Staffing | $8.6M | 1% |
| International Nurse Permanent Placement | $2.6M | 0% |
WWW
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $230.2M | 44% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $142.6M | 28% |
| Work Group | $134.0M | 26% |
| Other | $10.7M | 2% |
