vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Anika Therapeutics, Inc. (ANIK) and First Bancorp, Inc (FNLC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Anika Therapeutics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($29.6M vs $25.8M, roughly 1.1× First Bancorp, Inc). On growth, First Bancorp, Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.5% vs 13.2%). Over the past eight quarters, First Bancorp, Inc's revenue compounded faster (18.1% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Patriot Bank, N.A. (PNBK) is the bank holding company for Stamford, Connecticut-based Patriot Bank NA, and is traded on NASDAQ as PNBK.
ANIK vs FNLC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $29.6M | $25.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $10.2M |
| Gross Margin | 64.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 48.1% |
| Net Margin | — | 39.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.2% | 17.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 39.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.27 | $0.91 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $29.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.6M | $25.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.2M | $21.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.6M | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.6M | $20.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $19.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $292.0K | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.9M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-29.9M | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.0K | $6.2M |
| Q1 26 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 62.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 56.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 65.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 66.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 48.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.6% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.8% | 43.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.4% | 39.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 39.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 44.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 38.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 39.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.1% | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.6% | 32.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -71.4% | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -101.2% | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.3% | 32.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.91 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.16 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.28 | $0.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.34 | $0.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.49 | $0.66 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.03 | $0.68 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $95.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $133.9M | $283.1M |
| Total Assets | $179.4M | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.34× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $95.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $95.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $70.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $95.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $95.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | $133.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | $283.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.8M | $274.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $147.7M | $265.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.4M | $259.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.0M | $252.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $179.9M | $256.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $210.3M | $244.7M |
| Q1 26 | $179.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $190.3M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $189.4M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $187.7M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.6M | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $202.7M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.4M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.7M | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $37.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $34.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 133.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 12.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.72× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $55.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-189.0K | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-130.0K | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $6.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | $34.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0M | $12.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.0M | $828.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.0K | $24.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8M | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.5M | $6.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 133.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.9% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.9% | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 111.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.9% | 47.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.6% | 32.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.1% | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.88× | 3.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ANIK
| OEM Channel | $17.0M | 57% |
| Commercial Channel | $12.6M | 43% |
FNLC
Segment breakdown not available.
