vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Sphere 3D Corp. (ANY) and Chime Financial, Inc. (CHYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chime Financial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($543.5M vs $2.7M, roughly 199.6× Sphere 3D Corp.). On growth, Chime Financial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.8% vs 3.1%). Chime Financial, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($15.4M vs $-6.7M).
Sphere 3D Corp is a global technology company specializing in cloud computing, data management, and virtualization solutions. It delivers enterprise-grade products and services tailored for small to medium-sized businesses, large enterprise clients, and public sector entities, focusing on optimizing IT infrastructure efficiency and cutting operational costs for end users.
Chime Financial, Inc. is an American financial technology company based in San Francisco, California. It provides fee-free mobile banking services through two national banks, Stride Bank and The Bancorp Bank.
ANY vs CHYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7M | $543.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $-54.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 87.2% |
| Operating Margin | -372.7% | -11.9% |
| Net Margin | — | -10.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.1% | 28.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -148.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.96 | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6M | $543.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $528.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $421.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $384.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.2M | $-54.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | $-923.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.0K | $-22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | $385.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | 87.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.8% | 87.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.0% | 87.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.2% | 86.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -372.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -153.8% | -11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -87.0% | -176.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -184.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -328.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -218.8% | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -122.4% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -162.0% | -10.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.2% | -174.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -311.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | -5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -64.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-6.96 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $-7.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.62 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.27 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.7M | $445.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.3M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $25.1M | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3M | $445.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $868.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | $270.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $295.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.8M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.4M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $25.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $17.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.7M | $15.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -247.1% | 2.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 147.1% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-23.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $290.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-58.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-6.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.7M | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -247.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -218.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -200.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -181.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -220.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -184.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 147.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 86.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 163.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 196.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.51× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.79× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.55× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ANY
Segment breakdown not available.
CHYM
| Payments Revenue | $363.2M | 67% |
| Platform Related Revenue | $180.4M | 33% |
